Neoss4+ clinical case

Full-arch immediate loading using Neoss4+ treatment solution

Dr. Stefano Sicuro, DDS

Advanced Implant Prosthesis Team Leader
Maglie (LE), Italy

Case facts

Patient:

Male patient in their 60s with failing teeth in both jaws in need of extraction.

Clinical problem:

Failing teeth in both jaws in need of extraction. Post-extraction and healing, severe atrophy of the upper and lower jaw with reduced bone volumes both horizontally and vertically and little adherent gingiva in the lower arch is seen.

Clinical solution:

Extraction of teeth and placement of four implants in the lower jaw for immediate full-arch rehabilitation.

 
Treatment plan:
Products:

4 Neoss ProActive Tapered implants
2 Multi-Unit Abutment 3.0 mm
2 Multi-Unit Abutment 30° 3.0 mm
4 Multi-Unit Impression coping Open tray 6 mm
4 Multi-Unit Healing Cap

Conclusion:

The patient received the screw-retained bridge in the lower jaw 48 hours after surgery. In the upper jaw the patient was rehabilitated with a removable prosthesis. Patient to comeback for final prosthesis and full-arch treatment of upper jaw at a later date.

Step by step

Step by step

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pre-treatment panoramic radiograph. The patient had conventional, tooth-supported bridges in both jaws. All teeth were failing and in need of extraction.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Post-extractive panoramic radiograph. The patient had severe atrophy of the upper and lower jaws, little attached gingiva in the lower arch with reduced bone volumes both horizontally and vertically.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Panoramic radiograph at time of implant placement, four months after extraction. Four Neoss ProActive Tapered implants were placed in the lower jaw. The two posterior implants were tilted to minimize bridge cantilevers.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Neoss Multi-Unit abutments were placed at the time of implant placement . Angulated (30°) Multi-Unit abutments were used on the tilted posterior implants, and straight Multi-Unit abutments were used on the anterior implants.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
A conventional impression was taken after tissue closure at time of surgery. Open impression technique and Multi-Unit Impression Copings Open tray were used.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Impression acquired immediately after surgery.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Multi-Unit Abutment Healing Caps were placed on the Multi-Unit abutments, and the soft tissue repositioned and sutured around the Healing Caps to achieve more attached gingiva on the buccal side.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
The model was scanned and a provisional full-arch restoration designed using CAD. Note the parallel interfaces achieved using angulated Multi-Unit abutments.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
The dental laboratory milled a provisional screw-retained bridge from reinforced PMMA and bonded onto Multi-Unit Provisional Abutments.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Try-in of the provisional bridge on the model. Facial view.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
Try-in of the provisional bridge on the model. Occlusal view. Note the short cantilevers achieved using tilted posterior implants.
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
The patient received the screw-retained bridge in the lower jaw 48 hours after surgery. In the upper jaw the patient was rehabilitated with a removable prosthesis.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
Facial view of the patient with prostheses in place.

Downloads

Downloads

Multi-Unit Abutments product sheet
Multi-Unit Abutments product sheet
ProActive System Implant Box product sheet
ProActive System Implant Box product sheet
Surgical guidelines
Surgical guidelines