Elevate your bone regeneration game
Our comprehensive range of biomaterials offers solutions for a wide range of indications, from simple extraction sockets to more challenging procedures like sinus lifts and ridge augmentations.
- Clinically proven solutions with predictable and consistent results
- A wide range of options to cover all your GBR needs
- One-stop shop for solutions carefully selected for you
Webinars
Webinars
Neogen Cape membrane—introducing a breakthrough fixation method for PTFE membranes
Guided bone regeneration using PTFE barrier around dental implants
New concept for buccal bone regeneration – implant-supported PTFE membrane
NeoGenix™ Extraction Allograft
NeoGenix Extraction Allograft is a 100% human allograft fiber designed for optimal bone regeneration. Made from a unique blend of demineralized bone fibers and mineralized bone particulate, it combines the benefits of both cortical and cancellous bone materials to promote faster, stronger bone growth.
NeoGenix™ XP
NeoGen® Resorbable Collagen Membranes
- Easy to handle
- High mechanical strength
- Two degradation times for adequate site protection
NeoGen® PTFE Membranes
- Soft tissue friendly and resistant to bacteria
- Strong and shapeable mesh creates stability and flexibility
- Supports the regrowth of lost bone, about 1 mm per month
NeoGen® Cape PTFE Membranes
- Higher membrane stability thanks to implant fixation
- Easier fixation & fewer steps
- Predictable bone gain
Neoss® bone graft materials
- Clinically proven
- Predictable and consistent results
- Wide range of options for all your needs, including ready-to-use vials, curved syringes and collagen blocks.
Neoss®non-Resorbable PTFE Sutures
- Keeps the surgical site reliably closed
- Promotes wound healing
- Exceptional handling that is both supple and easy to knot
Neoss® Tacks & screws
- Fast and easy membrane fastening and removal
- Pick-up function for safe handling
- Screws with self-tapping properties (no pre-drilling)
NeoGen® Wound Dressing
- Require no preparation and are easy to cut to size
- Can be left in situ
- Available in packs of 10
Shop online and take advantage of our free shipping offer on all orders.
-1.png)
Biomaterials
A review of the published clinical and pre-clinical evidence. Sahlin H, Dahlin C, NeoGen PTFE membranes. Letters on Implant Dentistry 2022; 2: 57–61
In vitro evaluation of barrier function against oral bacteria of dense and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes for guided bone regeneration. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. Trobos M, Juhlin A, Shah FA, Hoffman M, Sahlin H, Dahlin C. 2018;20(5):738-748.
Vertical ridge augmentation with PTFE membranes and simultaneous implantation. A comparative study. Hassfurther N, Scheibelhut C, Hassfurther N, Pons-Kühnemann J, Howaldt H, Schaaf H. Clinical oral implants research. 2021;32(S22):160
Vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a Ti-reinforced non-resorbable e-PTFE membrane and simultaneous implant placement. A retrospective study. Hassfurther N, Hassfurther N,. Letters on Implant Dentistry 2022; 2: 62–66
Managing membrane complications. A technique description. Hassfurther N. Letters on Implant Dentistry 2017
A Comparative Study of a New Porcine Collagen Membrane to Bio-Gide®. Li et al, Science, Technology, Innovation 2015
Effectiveness of Xenograft and Porcine-Derived Resorbable Membrane in Augmentation of Posterior Extraction Sockets with a Severe Wall Defect. A Radiographic/Tomographic Evaluation. Guarnieri 2019
Comparing two ridge preservation techniques: with and without soft tissue primary closure. Pham et al. 2018
Extraction Socket Preservation using Porcine-derived Collagen Membrane Alone or Associated with Porcine-derived Bone Graft. Clinical results of Randomized Controlled Study. Guarnieri. 2017
Tissue Dimensional Changes Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation with Different Xenografts Associated with a Collagen Membrane. Results at the 4-Month Re-Entry Surgery. Guarnieri. 2017
Process development of a virally-safe dental xenograft material from porcine bones.” 2016
Effect of the calcination temperature on the composition and microstructure of hydroxyapatite derived from human and animal bone, M. Figueiredo, et al. 2010.
Osteogenic effect of low-temperature-heated porcine bone particles in a rat calvarial defect model., Go A, Kim SE, Shim KM, Lee SM, Choi SH, Son JS, Kang SS. Kim et al. 2014
Physicochemical characterization of porcine bone-derived grafting material and comparison with bovine xenografts for dental applications. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Dec;47(6):388-401
Alveolar ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized porcine versus bovine bone minerals: A randomized clinical trial. 100 patients. 2018
Randomized Clinical Trial of Maxillary Sinus Grafting using Deproteinized Porcine and Bovine Bone Mineral. 16 Patients. 2017
Isolation and Characterization of a Porous Carbonate Apatite From Porcine Cancellous Bone. Li et al. 2014
Porcine anorganic bone mineral for GBR in dental surgeries. Part II In vivo animal study and human case study. Chen. 2016.
Comparison of Clinical Parameters in Dental Implant Therapy between Implant Site Development Using Porcine- and Bovine-Derived Xenografts. Li-Ching Chang. 2021
Effectiveness of Xenograft and Porcine-Derived Resorbable Membrane in Augmentation of Posterior Extraction Sockets with a Severe Wall Defect. A Radiographic/Tomographic Evaluation. Guarnieri 2019
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing bovine versus porcine bone xenografts mixed with autogenous bone graft. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Moreno et al. 2021
Product availability may vary depending on the market or region. For more information, please contact your nearest Neoss office.